AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Management of Perforations in Gastrointestinal Tract: Expert Review

      Best Practice Advice 1

      For all procedures, especially procedures carrying an increased risk for perforation, a thorough discussion between the endoscopist and the patient (preferably together with the patient’s family) should include details of the procedural techniques and risks involved.

      Best Practice Advice 2

      The area of perforation should be kept clean to prevent any spillage of gastrointestinal contents into the perforation by aspirating liquids and, if necessary, changing the patient position to bring the perforation into a non-dependent location while minimizing insufflation of carbon dioxide to avoid compartment syndrome.

      Best Practice Advice 3

      Use of carbon dioxide for insufflation is encouraged for all endoscopic procedures, especially any endoscopic procedure with increased risk of perforation. If available, carbon dioxide should be used for all endoscopic procedures.

      Best Practice Advice 4

      All endoscopists should be aware of the procedures that carry an increased risk for perforation such as any dilation, foreign body removal, any per oral endoscopic myotomy (Zenker’s, esophageal, pyloric), stricture incision, thermal coagulation for hemostasis or tumor ablation, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, ampullectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoluminal stenting with self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), full-thickness endoscopic resection, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in surgically altered anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary and pancreatic access, EUS-guided cystogastrostomy, and endoscopic gastroenterostomy using a lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS).

      Best Practice Advice 5

      Urgent surgical consultation should be highly considered in all cases with perforation even when endoscopic repair is technically successful.

      Best Practice Advice 6

      For all upper gastrointestinal perforations, the patient should be considered to be admitted for observation, receive intravenous fluids, be kept nothing by mouth, receive broad-spectrum antibiotics (to cover Gram-negative and anaerobic organisms), nasogastric tube (NGT) placement (albeit some exceptions), and surgical consultation.

      Best Practice Advice 7

      For upper gastrointestinal tract perforations, a water-soluble upper gastrointestinal series should be considered to confirm the absence of continuing leak at the perforation site before initiating a clear liquid diet.

      Best Practice Advice 8

      Endoscopic closure of esophageal perforations should be pursued when feasible, utilizing through-the-scope clips (TTSCs) or over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) for perforations <2 cm and endoscopic suturing for perforations >2 cm, reserving esophageal stenting with SEMS for cases where primary closure is not possible.

      Best Practice Advice 9

      Endoscopic closure of gastric perforations should be pursued when feasible, utilizing TTSCs or OTSCs for perforations <2 cm and endoscopic suturing or combination of TTSCs and endoloop for perforations >2 cm.

      Best Practice Advice 10

      For large type 1 duodenal perforations (lateral duodenal wall tear >3 cm), being cognizant of the difficulty in closing them endoscopically, urgent surgical consultation should be made while the feasibility of endoscopic closure is assessed.

      Best Practice Advice 11

      Because type 2 periampullary (retroperitoneal) perforations are subtle and can be easily missed, the endoscopist should carefully assess the gas pattern on fluoroscopy to avoid delays in treatment and request a computed tomography scan if there is a concern for such a perforation; identified perforations of this type at the time of ERCP may be closed with TTSCs if feasible and/or by placing a fully covered SEMS into the bile duct across the ampulla.

      Best Practice Advice 12

      For the management of large duodenal polyps, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) should only be performed by experienced endoscopists and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) only by experts because both EMR and ESD in the duodenum require proficiency in resection and mucosal defect closure techniques to manage immediate and/or delayed perforations (caused by the proteolytic enzymes of the pancreas).

      Best Practice Advice 13

      Endoscopists should be aware that colon perforations occurring during diagnostic colonoscopy are most commonly located in the sigmoid colon due to direct trauma from forceful advancement of the colonoscope. Such tears recognized at the time of colonoscopy may be closed by TTSCs or OTSCs if the bowel preparation is good and the patient is stable.

      Best Practice Advice 14

      Although colon perforation is responsive to various endoscopic tools such as TTSC, OTSC, and endoscopic suturing, perforations in the right colon, especially in the cecum, have been relegated to using only TTSCs because of inability to reach the site of the perforation with an endoscopic suturing device or OTSC if the colon is tortuous or unclean. Recently a new suture-based device for defect closure has been introduced allowing deep submucosal and intramuscular enhanced fixation through a standard gastroscope or colonoscope.

      Best Practice Advice 15

      Patients with perforations who are hemodynamically unstable or who have suffered a delayed perforation with peritoneal signs or frank peritonitis should be surgically managed without any attempt at endoscopic closure.

      Best Practice Advice 16

      In any adverse event including perforation, it is paramount to ensure accurate documentation, prompt discussion with the patient and family, and swift reporting to the quality officer (or equivalent) and risk management team of the institution (in major adverse events).

      Abbreviations used in this paper:

      EMR (endoscopic mucosal resection), ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), NPT (nasopancreatic tube), OTSC (over-the-scope clip), POEM (peroral endoscopic myotomy), SEMS (self-expanding metal stent), TTSC (through-the-scope clip)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      AGA Member Login
      Login with your AGA username and password.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Runge T.M.
        • Eluri S.
        • Cotton C.C.
        • et al.
        Causes and outcomes of esophageal perforation in eosinophilic esophagitis.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017; 51: 805-813
        • Arias-González L.
        • Rey-Iborra E.
        • Ruiz-Ponce M.
        • et al.
        Esophageal perforation in eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review on clinical presentation, management and outcomes.
        Dig Liver Dis. 2020; 52: 245-252
        • Ben-Menachem T.
        • Decker G.
        • Early D.
        • et al.
        Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy.
        YMGE. 2012; 76: 707-718
        • Boeckxstaens G.E.
        • Annese V.
        • Varannes SB des
        • et al.
        Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1807-1816
        • Campos G.M.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Rabl C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 249: 45-57
        • Moss A.
        • Bourke M.J.
        • Hourigan L.F.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic resection for Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma: an essential staging procedure with long-term therapeutic benefit.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 1276-1283
        • Pouw R.E.
        • Seewald S.
        • Gondrie J.J.
        • et al.
        Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for eradication of Barrett’s oesophagus with early neoplasia in a cohort of 169 patients.
        Gut. 2010; 59: 1169-1177
        • Modayil R.J.
        • Zhang X.
        • Rothberg B.
        • et al.
        Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): 10-year outcome from a large US referral center.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: AB125-AB126
        • Wang Y.
        • Liu Z.Q.
        • Xu M.D.
        • et al.
        Clinical and endoscopic predictors for intraprocedural mucosal injury during per-oral endoscopic myotomy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 769-778
        • Werner Y.B.
        • von Renteln D.
        • Noder T.
        • et al.
        Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 708-718.e2
        • Stavropoulos S.N.
        • Modayil R.J.
        • Friedel D.
        • et al.
        The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 3322-3338
        • Zhang X.C.
        • Li Q.L.
        • Xu M.D.
        • et al.
        Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 967-978
        • Haito-Chavez Y.
        • Inoue H.
        • Beard K.W.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with per oral endoscopic myotomy in 1826 patients: an international multicenter study.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 1267-1276
        • Patel K.
        • Abbassi-Ghadi N.
        • Markar S.
        • et al.
        Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis.
        Dis Esophagus. 2016; 29: 807-819
        • Akintoye E.
        • Kumar N.
        • Obaitan I.
        • et al.
        Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 1059-1068
        • Bartell N.
        • Bittner K.
        • Kaul V.
        • et al.
        Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: a systematic review.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26: 3495-3516
        • Ling T.
        • Pei Q.
        • Pan J.
        • et al.
        Successful use of a covered, retrievable stent to seal a ruptured mucosal flap safety valve during peroral endoscopic myotomy in a child with achalasia.
        Endoscopy. 2013; 45
        • Zhang W.G.
        • Linghu E.Q.
        • Li H.K.
        Fibrin sealant for closure of mucosal penetration at the cardia during peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective study at a single center.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23: 1637-1644
        • Modayil R.
        • Friedel D.
        • Stavropoulos S.N.
        Endoscopic suture repair of a large mucosal perforation during peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 1169-1170
        • De Santiago E.R.
        • Mohammed N.
        • Manolakis A.
        • et al.
        Anterior versus posterior myotomy during POEM for the treatment of achalasia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
        J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2019; 28: 107-115
        • Khashab M.A.
        • Sanaei O.
        • Ponchon T.
        • et al.
        837 Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): anterior versus posterior approach, a randomized single-blinded clinical trial.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: AB119
        • Stavropoulos S.N.
        • Modayil R.J.
        • Zhang X.
        • et al.
        Is there a difference in outcomes between anterior and posterior peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)? a randomized study from an experienced high-volume operator.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: AB121-AB122
        • Tan Y.
        • Lv L.
        • Wang X.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of anterior versus posterior per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia: a randomized, prospective study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 46-54
        • Ramchandani M.
        • Nabi Z.
        • Reddy D.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of anterior myotomy versus posterior myotomy during POEM: a randomized pilot study.
        Endosc Int Open. 2018; 06: E190-E198
        • Kuehn F.
        • Loske G.
        • Schiffmann L.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic vacuum therapy for various defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 3449-3458
        • Yamamoto Y.
        • Kikuchi D.
        • Nagami Y.
        • et al.
        Management of adverse events related to endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms: review of the literature and recommendations from experts.
        Dig Endosc. 2019; 31: 4-20
        • Minami S.
        • Gotoda T.
        • Ono H.
        • et al.
        Complete endoscopic closure of gastric perforation induced by endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer using endoclips can prevent surgery (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63: 596-601
        • Maekawa S.
        • Nomura R.
        • Murase T.
        • et al.
        Complete closure of artificial gastric ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection by combined use of a single over-the-scope clip and through-the-scope clips (with videos).
        Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 500-504
        • Sachdev A.H.
        • Iqbal S.
        • Ribeiro I.B.
        • et al.
        Use of omental patch and endoscopic closure technique as an alternative to surgery after endoscopic full thickness resection of gastric intestinal stromal tumors: a series of cases.
        World J Clin Cases. 2020; 8: 120-125
        • Han S.
        • Wani S.
        • Edmundowicz S.A.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of endoscopic suturing to prevent adverse events and hospitalization after endoscopic submucosal dissection.
        Endosc Int Open. 2020; 08: E1212-E1217
        • Andriulli A.
        • Loperfido S.
        • Napolitano G.
        • et al.
        Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 1781-1788
        • Paspatis G.A.
        • Arvanitakis M.
        • Dumonceau J.-M.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement—update 2020.
        Endoscopy. 2020; 52: 792-810
        • Stapfer M.
        • Selby R.R.
        • Stain S.C.
        • et al.
        Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 191-198
      1. The usefulness and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. PubMed n.d.
        (Available at:)
        Date accessed: December 1, 2020
        • Enns R.
        • Eloubeidi M.A.
        • Mergener K.
        • et al.
        ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management.
        Endoscopy. 2002; 34: 293-298
        • Freeman M.L.
        Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. avoidance and management.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012; 22: 567-586
        • Norton I.D.
        • Petersen B.T.
        • Bosco J.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy using pure-cut versus combined cut and coagulation waveforms.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 3: 1029-1033
        • Perini R.F.
        • Sadurski R.
        • Cotton P.B.
        • et al.
        Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference?.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 53-57
        • Kumbhari V.
        • Sinha A.
        • Reddy A.
        • et al.
        Algorithm for the management of ERCP-related perforations.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 934-943
        • Lee D.
        • Jin Y.J.
        • Jeong S.
        • et al.
        Clinical course and proposed treatment strategy for ERCP-related duodenal perforation: a multicenter analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2013; 45: 806-812
        • Park S.M.
        Recent advanced endoscopic management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related duodenal perforations.
        Clin Endosc. 2016; 49: 376-382
        • Mangiavillano B.
        • Caruso A.
        • Manta R.
        • et al.
        Over-the-scope clips in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract iatrogenic perforation: a multicenter retrospective study and a classification of gastrointestinal tract perforations.
        World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 8: 315
        • Nakagawa Y.
        • Nagai T.
        • Soma W.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic closure of a large ERCP-related lateral duodenal perforation by using endoloops and endoclips.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 216-217
        • Verlaan T.
        • Voermans R.P.
        • Van Berge Henegouwen M.I.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic closure of acute perforations of the GI tract: a systematic review of the literature.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82: 618-628.e5
        • Stavropoulos S.N.
        • Modayil R.
        • Friedel D.
        Current applications of endoscopic suturing.
        World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 7: 777
        • Yilmaz B.
        • Unlu O.
        • Roach E.C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic clips for the closure of acute iatrogenic perforations: where do we stand?.
        Dig Endosc. 2015; 27: 641-648
        • Mendez M.A.
        • Mata J.G.A.
        • Mladineo C.F.
        • et al.
        Retroperitoneal air after ERCP with sphincterotomy: frequency and clinical significance—retroperitoneal air after sphincterotomy.
        Open J Gastroenterol. 2016; 6: 31-38
        • Vezakis A.
        • Fragulidis G.
        • Nastos C.
        • et al.
        Closure of a persistent sphincterotomy-related duodenal perforation by placement of a covered self-expandable metallic biliary stent.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17: 4539-4541
        • Odemis B.
        • Oztas E.
        • Kuzu U.B.
        • et al.
        Can a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent be used temporarily for the management of duodenal retroperitoneal perforation during ERCP as a part of conservative therapy?.
        Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2016; 26: e9-e17
        • Fukuhara S.
        • Kato M.
        • Iwasaki E.
        • et al.
        Management of perforation related to endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 1129-1137
        • Navaneethan U.
        • Lourdusamy V.
        • Njei B.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic balloon dilation in the management of strictures in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized trials.
        Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 5434-5443
        • Hassan C.
        • Repici A.
        • Sharma P.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gut. 2016; 65: 806-820
        • Alsowaina K.N.
        • Ahmed M.A.
        • Alkhamesi N.A.
        • et al.
        Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 3889-3898
        • Van Halsema E.E.
        • Van Hooft J.E.
        • Small A.J.
        • et al.
        Perforation in colorectal stenting: a meta-analysis and a search for risk factors.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79: 970-982.e7
        • Lee J.H.
        • Emelogu I.
        • Kukreja K.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction in patients treated with bevacizumab.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90: 116-124
        • Lee Y.J.
        • Yoon J.Y.
        • Park J.J.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes and factors related to colonic perforations in patients receiving self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1548-1557.e1
        • Holmer C.
        • Mallmann C.A.
        • Musch M.A.
        • et al.
        Surgical management of iatrogenic perforation of the gastrointestinal tract: 15 years of experience in a single center.
        World J Surg. 2017; 41: 1961-1965
        • Kang D.H.
        • Ryu D.G.
        • Choi C.W.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes of iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal endoscopic perforation: a 10-year study.
        BMC Gastroenterol. 2019; 19: 218
        • Kumar S.
        • Youn Y.H.
        • Lee J.H.
        Life on a knife edge: the optimal approach to the management of perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
        Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; : 1-9
        • Bar-Yishay I.
        • Shahidi N.
        • Gupta S.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of deep mural injury after endoscopic resection: an international cohort of 3717 large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;


        • Kirschniak A.
        • Subotova N.
        • Zieker D.
        • et al.
        The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, and fistulas.
        Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 2901-2905
        • Baron T.H.
        • Wong Kee Song L.M.
        • Zielinski M.D.
        • et al.
        A comprehensive approach to the management of acute endoscopic perforations (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76: 838-859
        • Voermans R.P.
        • Le Moine O.
        • von Renteln D.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of endoscopic closure of acute perforations of the gastrointestinal tract.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10: 603-608
        • Hagel A.F.
        • Naegel A.
        • Lindner A.S.
        • et al.
        Over-the-scope clip application yields a high rate of closure in gastrointestinal perforations and may reduce emergency surgery.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 2132-2138
        • Haito-Chavez Y.
        • Law J.K.
        • Kratt T.
        • et al.
        International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 610-622
        • Jacobsen G.R.
        • Coker A.M.
        • Acosta G.
        • et al.
        Initial experience with an innovative endoscopic clipping system.
        Surg Technol Int. 2012; 22: 39-43
        • Nishiyama N.
        • Mori H.
        • Kobara H.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clip: including complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 2752-2760
        • Ramhamadany E.
        • Mohamed S.
        • Jaunoo S.
        • et al.
        A delayed presentation of Boerhaave’s syndrome with mediastinitis managed using the over-the-scope clip.
        J Surg Case Reports. 2013; 2013 (rjt020-rjt020)
        • Ferreira A.O.
        • Lopes J.
        • Velosa J.
        Snapper fishbone esophageal perforation closed with an over-the-scope-clip.
        BMJ Case Rep. 2013;
        • Bona D.
        • Aiolfi A.
        • Rausa E.
        • et al.
        Management of boerhaave’s syndrome with an over-the-scope clip.
        Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2014; 45: 752-754
        • Ono H.
        • Tanaka M.
        • Takizawa K.
        • et al.
        Utility of the over-the-scope-clip system for treating a large esophageal perforation.
        Esophagus. 2015; 12: 336-339
        • Mezzetto L.
        • Treppiedi E.
        • Scorsone L.
        • et al.
        Thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm after esophageal perforation and mediastinitis caused by accidental ingestion of a mutton bone: a case report on staged endoscopic and endovascular treatments.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 30: e15-307.e19
        • Lee H.L.
        • Cho J.Y.
        • Cho J.-H.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of the over-the-scope clip system for treatment of gastrointestinal fistulas, leaks, and perforations: a Korean multi-center study.
        Clin Endosc. 2018; 51: 61-65
        • Robotis J.
        • Karabinis A.
        Esophageal perforation due to transesophageal echocardiogram: new endoscopic clip treatment.
        Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2014; 8: 235-239
        • González-Haba M.
        • Ferguson M.K.
        • Gelrud A.
        Spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave syndrome) successfully treated with an over-the-scope clip and fully covered metal stent.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 650
        • Sanaka M.R.
        • Raja S.
        • Thota P.N.
        Esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 50: 267-268
        • Mangiavillano B.
        • Conio M.
        Closure of a cervical esophageal perforation with an over-the-scope clip.
        Endoscopy. 2015; 47: E320
        • Rodríguez-Escaja C.
        • Carreño E.
        • Gornals J.B.
        Esophageal perforation and dissection due to echocardiography: endoscopic treatment using an over-the-scope clip.
        Dig Liver Dis. 2018; 50: 202
        • Tashima T.
        • Nonaka K.
        • Tanisaka Y.
        • et al.
        Gastrointestinal: successful endoscopic fat patch with an over-the-scope clip for endoscopic ultrasonography-related large esophageal perforation.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 35 (8–8)
        • He F.
        • Dai M.
        • Zhou J.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic repair of spontaneous esophageal rupture during gastroscopy: a CARE compliant case report.
        Med (United States). 2018; 97
        • Barakat M.T.
        • Girotra M.
        • Banerjee S.
        (Re)building the wall: recurrent Boerhaave syndrome managed by over-the-scope clip and covered metallic stent placement.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2018; 63: 1139-1142