Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 46-51, January 2012

Adverse Events Do Not Outweigh Benefits of Combination Therapy for Crohn's Disease in a Decision Analytic Model

  • Corey A. Siegel

      Affiliations

    • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
    • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Corey A. Siegel, MD, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756. fax: (603) 650-5225
  • ,
  • Samuel R.G. Finlayson

      Affiliations

    • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
  • ,
  • Bruce E. Sands

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Anna N.A. Tosteson

      Affiliations

    • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire

published online 03 October 2011.

Background & Aims

The Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator-Naïve Patients With Crohn's Disease (SONIC) showed that combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine (IFX/AZA) is more effective than treatment with IFX alone. Numbers and types of adverse events were roughly equivalent among groups, although enrollment was limited, so it was not clear how rare adverse events might affect overall outcomes in practice. We sought to define the frequency at which a rare adverse event would have to occur for the risks of combination therapy to outweigh the benefits of treatment.

Methods

We constructed a decision model to compare the risks and benefits of IFX/AZA with IFX monotherapy. Model parameters were taken from SONIC and other published literature. The base-case analysis was patients with active Crohn's disease who are naïve to both medications (similar to those in SONIC) who were treated for 1 year. We used sensitivity analyses to determine the thresholds at which the risks of side effects from IFX/AZA outweigh its benefits.

Results

During 1 year, the benefits of IFX/AZA would outweigh the risks, unless serious infections occurred in 20% or more of the population or lymphoma in 3.9% or more. These thresholds are 5-fold and 65-fold higher than base-case estimates, respectively.

Conclusions

On the basis of data from 1 year of SONIC, the combination of IFX/AZA was more effective than IFX alone in patients with Crohn's disease who are naïve to either drug. For the risks of combination therapy to outweigh the benefits in this time frame, the incidence of serious adverse events would have to be higher than seems clinically realistic.

Keywords:  Inflammation , Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Agent , Side Effect , Intestine , IBD , Complication

Abbreviations used in this paper:  AZA, azathioprine, IFX, infliximab, NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, QALY, quality-adjusted life-years, SAE, serious adverse event, SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, SONIC, Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator-Naïve Patients With Crohn's Disease, TNF, tumor necrosis factor

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Dr Siegel serves as a consultant to Abbott Laboratories, UCB, and Elan and has delivered CME talks for Merck and Abbott Laboratories. Dr Sands serves as a consultant to Abbott Laboratories, Centocor, and UCB. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

 Funding Dr Siegel is supported by a CCFA career development award and by grant number K23DK078678 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

PII: S1542-3565(11)01021-4

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.017

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 46-51, January 2012