Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 7, Issue 12 , Pages 1335-1340, December 2009

Variation in Detection of Adenomas and Polyps by Colonoscopy and Change Over Time With a Performance Improvement Program

  • Aasma Shaukat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, One Veterans Drive, 111-D, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417. fax: 612-725-2248
  • ,
  • Cristina Oancea

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • John H. Bond

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Timothy R. Church

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • John I. Allen

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Minnesota Gastroenterology PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota

published online 10 August 2009.

Background & Aims

There has been no prospective, community-based study to track changes in adenoma detection by individual physicians over time and to determine the effectiveness of targeted educational interventions.

Methods

We prospectively collected information on 47,253 screening colonoscopies in average-risk individuals 50 years and older performed by a community-based practice in the Twin Cities of Minnesota. During a period of 3 years, 5 specific interventions were implemented; each was designed to improve adenoma detection rates. Controlling for patient-related and procedure-related factors, rates of adenoma detection and 3-year trends for individual physicians were plotted, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with detection of adenomas and polyps.

Results

At least 1 polyp and 1 adenoma were found in 36% and 22% of examinations, respectively. Adenoma detection rates by endoscopists ranged from 10%–39%. There was no significant improvement during the study period despite planned, systematic interventions. Factors associated with adenoma detection included age of the patient (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.02), male sex (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.34–1.74), and adequate preparation quality (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.64–3.12).

Conclusions

The detection of adenomas by individual physicians during a 3-year period varied and did not appear to change between individual endoscopists, despite planned, systematic interventions. This indicates that other targeted interventions might be required to improve adenoma detection rates among experienced, community gastroenterologists.

Abbreviations used in this paper: AEC, ambulatory endoscopy center, CI, confidence interval, CRC, colorectal cancer, GEE, generalized estimating equations, OR, odds ratio

 

 Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

 Funding Supported in part by grant VA Minneapolis Center for Epidemiological and Clinical Research (CECR) #04S-CRCOE-001 (A.S.) and ASGE Endoscopic Research Award (A.S.).

PII: S1542-3565(09)00744-7

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.027

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 7, Issue 12 , Pages 1335-1340, December 2009