Search for

Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 1028-1036 (October 2009)


View previous. 13 of 37 View next.

Continuing Medical EducationEfficacy of Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy in Community-Based Trials

Paul MarottaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Dietrich Hueppe, Elmar Zehnter§, Paul Kwo, Ira Jacobson

published online 18 May 2009.

Refers to article:
Exam 1: Efficacy of Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy in Community-Based Trials , 25 August 2009
C. Mel Wilcox
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
October 2009 (Vol. 7, Issue 10, Pages 1021-1022)
Full-Text PDF (91 KB)

Prospective, randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trials establish pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa plus ribavirin as the standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Such clinical trials are conducted in a highly regimented manner; patients must meet strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment is administered under rigid protocols with close monitoring by study personnel. Whether the results of phase 3 trials can be generalized or achieved in everyday clinical practice is questioned in several therapeutic areas. The efficacy of PEG-IFN alfa plus ribavirin therapy observed in pivotal phase 3 trials has been confirmed in several community-based trials conducted in North America and Europe, demonstrating consistent overall rates of sustained virologic response across a wide range of patient populations. Sustained virologic response rates stratified by genotype, viral load, fibrosis score, age, and ethnicity, factors known to impact treatment outcome, are consistent between these trials and comparable to those reported in clinical trials. The United States–based WIN-R trial confirmed the value of combining weight-based ribavirin dosing with weight-based PEG-IFN alfa-2b dosing across a spectrum of patient body weights. Large Canadian trials (POWeR and EAP), a German trial (AWB), a French study (Hepatys), and an Italian study demonstrated that PEG-IFN alfa plus ribavirin produces excellent efficacy in difficult-to-treat patient populations. Collectively, these results confirm the efficacy of current standard treatment regimens in a wide range of community-based settings, affording clinicians confidence that they can attain results similar to those of rigidly controlled randomized trials.

 London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

 Center of Gastroenterology, Herne, Germany

§ Center of Gastroenterology, Dortmund, Germany

 Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

 Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, New York, New York

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Paul Marotta, MD, FRCP, University of Western Ontario/London Health Sciences Centre, Transplant Hepatology and Gastroenterology, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5. fax: (519) 663-3858

 This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page 1022. Learning Objectives—At the end of this activity the learner should recognize the different manner in which pivotal trials are conducted at academic medical centers as compared to trials in the community, appreciate the factors associated with a higher sustained virological response after therapy, and understand the importance of body weight dosing for ribavirin.

 Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: P. Marotta has received grant/research support from Human Genome Sciences, Novartis, Roche, and Schering-Plough. D. Hueppe has served as a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Roche, and Schering-Plough. P. Kwo is a consultant for Schering-Plough, is on the speakers' bureaus for Roche and Schering-Plough, and has received grant/research support from Roche and Schering-Plough. I. M. Jacobson has received grant/research support from Anadys, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Coley, Dynavax, Gilead, GlobeImmune, Human Genome Sciences, Idenix, InterMune, Novartis, Schering-Plough, Valeant, and Vertex; has served as a consultant/advisor for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlobeImmune, Human Genome Sciences, Idenix, InterMune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmasset, Roche, Schering-Plough, Vertex, Zymogenetics; and has served on the speakers bureaus for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Idenix, Novartis, and Schering-Plough. E. Zehnter discloses no conflicts.

 Funding Writing assistance was funded by Schering-Plough.

PII: S1542-3565(09)00437-6

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.003


View previous. 13 of 37 View next.