Advertisement
Search for

Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 389-396 (April 2009)


View previous. 13 of 33 View next.

Additional Online Content AvailableValidation of the X-Vision ERCP Training System and Technical Challenges During Early Training of Sphincterotomy

Stefan von Delius, Philipp Thies, Alexander Meining, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Maria Burian§, Wolfgang Huber, Hans Weidenbach, Matthias P. Ebert, Bruno Neu, Leopold Ludwig, John Almeida, Christian Prinz, Roland M. Schmid, Eckart FrimbergerCorresponding Author Informationemail address

published online 11 November 2008.

Background & Aims

A new fluoroscopy-free training system for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with different model subtypes recently was developed. This study aimed to establish construct validity by investigating whether the X-Vision ERCP Training System could distinguish experienced endoscopists from beginners and to reveal characteristic mistakes during sphincterotomy.

Methods

Six staff gastroenterologists that practice ERCP, 10 trainees that perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy, and 12 residents without endoscopic experience each sequentially attempted 4 different models, simulating selective cannulation of the pancreatic or bile duct, intubation of differently arranged rubber papillas, stent placement, and sphincterotomy of a biopapilla. Performance parameters were recorded and participants' expectations were compared before and after training to determine whether the simulator was a credible tool for ERCP training. Staff gastroenterologists graded the realism and utility of the simulation. The quality of sphincterotomy was assessed by an expert endoscopist.

Results

Participants with ERCP experience had significantly shorter procedure times compared with those with intermediate (P < .001) or no endoscopic experience (P < .001). Total and single credibility scores significantly increased after simulator practice. The faculty found the X-Vision ERCP Training System to be realistic and useful for training. In the less-experienced groups, common mistakes made during sphincterotomy included inadequate positioning of the duodenoscope, traumatic intubation of the papilla, and continued cutting despite insufficient endoscopic view.

Conclusions

The X-Vision ERCP Training System distinguished subjects with different levels of experience and was regarded as realistic and useful for ERCP training. Common mistakes during sphincterotomy could be assessed objectively.

Abbreviation used in this paperERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

 2nd Medical Department, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany

 Institute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany

§ Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany

 Gastrointestinal and Liver Unit, The Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Eckart Frimberger, 2nd Medical Department, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 München, Germany; fax: (49) 89-4140-4905

 Conflicts of interest The authors disclose the following: E.F. is the inventor of the training models. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

 Funding Support for this study was provided Karl Storz Endoscopes (Tutlingen, Germany).

PII: S1542-3565(08)01118-X

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.004


View previous. 13 of 33 View next.

Advertisement