Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 6-10, January 2006

Short Bowel Syndrome and Intestinal Failure: Consensus Definitions and Overview

  • Stephen J.D. O’Keefe

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Stephen J. D. O’Keefe, MD, MSC, University of Pittsburgh, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, 200 Lothrop St, Mezzanine Level C-Wing, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; fax: 412-648-9378.
  • ,
  • Alan L. Buchman

      Affiliations

    • Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Thomas M. Fishbein

      Affiliations

    • Georgetown University, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Khursheed N. Jeejeebhoy

      Affiliations

    • St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Palle Bekker Jeppesen

      Affiliations

    • Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Jonathan Shaffer

      Affiliations

    • Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom

published online 30 December 2005.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS)–associated intestinal failure is a highly disabling condition that impairs quality of life and social integration. Although the condition is not uniformly fatal, it might lead to serious, life-threatening complications. The basic goals of medical treatment are to maintain fluid, electrolyte, and nutrient balances and to make appropriate modifications in disease management to avoid side effects. Various definitions have been proposed for SBS and intestinal failure within the medical literature, but many focus on different aspects of the conditions, leading to confusion. In the past, identifying the cause of intestinal failure was of little consequence, because all patients were managed on total parenteral nutrition at home. However, with the recent development of medical therapies such as recombinant growth hormone, octreotide, and glucagon-like peptide-2 analogues and with improvements in small bowel transplantation, many patients can be made nutritionally autonomous. To evaluate the relative efficacy of these therapies, there is now a need to develop consensus definitions so that patients can be properly categorized before therapy. To this end, a group of experts on the subject was convened to develop the following new definitions: “Intestinal failure results from obstruction, dysmotility, surgical resection, congenital defect, or disease-associated loss of absorption and is characterized by the inability to maintain protein-energy, fluid, electrolyte, or micronutrient balance.” “Short-bowel syndrome results from surgical resection, congenital defect, or disease-associated loss of absorption and is characterized by the inability to maintain protein-energy, fluid, electrolyte, or micronutrient balances when on a conventionally accepted, normal diet.”

Abbreviation used in this paper:  SBS, short bowel syndrome

 

 Dr Jeppesen has served as a consultant for NPS Pharmaceuticals.

 Funding for the meeting of the panel of experts was provided by NPS Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, Utah. The views contained are solely those of the expert panel.

PII: S1542-3565(05)00994-8

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.002

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 6-10, January 2006