Advertisement
Search for

Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 404-413 (September 2003)


View previous. 17 of 17

An evidence-based medicine approach to economic studies: assessing the cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for colorectal cancer screening

John M InadomiCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Amnon Sonnenberg§

Abstract 

Cost-effectiveness analysis aims to quantitatively compare the expected outcomes of competing management strategies in environments with limited economic resources. A valid economic study models all relevant strategies from an appropriate perspective. The model must use costs that are accurately measured and strategies that have established clinical effectiveness, and appropriately integrate these data. The results should include the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which quantifies the resources required to achieve greater benefit with one strategy compared to another. A sensitivity analysis is required to determine whether uncertainty in assumptions alters the conclusions. Final interpretation of a cost-effectiveness analysis relies on whether costs and outcomes in the study can be realized in one’s own health care environment.

 Veterans Administration Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

§ The Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA

 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA

Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: John M. Inadomi, M.D., VA Medical Center (111-D), 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 USA fax: (734) 761-7549

PII: S1542-3565(03)00181-2

doi:10.1053/S1542-3565(03)00181-2


View previous. 17 of 17

Advertisement