Nutrition in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis☆

Abstract 

Comparative trials have shown that enteral feeding (EN) is better than total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in acute pancreatitis. However, the following case report of a 64-year-old man with necrotizing pancreatitis suggests that EN may cause complications in patients with ductular damage. In the second week, this patient with acute pancreatitis developed >50% pancreatic necrosis, resulting in gastroduodenal obstruction and pain, leading to the use of TPN. A trial of EN delivered past the obstruction was associated with increased abdominal pain, leukocytosis, and pancreatic fluid accumulation. Measurement of the pancreatic response to feeding showed a 90% reduction in enzyme secretion compared to healthy volunteers, but no change in the uptake of stable isotope labeled amino acids into secreted trypsin. This suggests that enzymes were being synthesized by the remaining pancreatic tissue, but that some of the secretions were leaking into the inflammatory mass. Symptoms resolved after reinstitution of TPN and bowel rest. A further trial of EN was successful when the tube was advanced to the distal jejunum to avoid pancreatic stimulation. After 3 weeks of home EN, he was readmitted for surgical evacuation of an infected fluid collection. Although enteral feeding is generally better than TPN in the nutritional management of acute pancreatitis, there may be a subgroup of patients with ductular damage due to necrotizing disease in whom TPN and pancreatic rest may be safer.

Abbreviations:  CT, computerized tomography, EN, enteral feeding, TPN, total parenteral nutrition, WBC, white blood count